Voting:Level 5's and Up/Unfair Counsellor Challenge Voting - Passed

Ok, so I've come across yet another situation where a counsellor challenge was judged unfairly, and considering how often it's happened over the course of the last year, despite the new judging style, something needs to be done. I'm not saying in this last challenge the challenger "should" have won, but the points they were given in general were complete BS. I've also seen challenges in the past where the "winner" godmodded 4 to 5 of the moves and took zero hits, yet the loser took hits and didn't godmod, but somehow lost?

I'm proposing that we (nar gave me the idea, sorta) have a system where if one of the contestants/users feel they were judged unfairly, they can call for an inquiry into the voting/challenge. Three members of the admin team will be randomly selected (those who have no personal involvement within the challenge, as either a contestant or judge) and will read over the challenge and give decide by a vote if it was judged unfairly or fairly. If judged unfairly, the judges will score the vote. This doesn't always mean a new winner will be chosen, the loser could still lose, but perhaps by fewer points.

Now you may ask, why does it matter if it was unfair, if the person would have lost anyway, well do we really want user's judging challenges who are clearly acting biased or maybe if they aren't meaning to act biased are unfit to judge?

So this vote will be for or against having a system where the judge's decision can be challenged and have 3 member's from the admin team make a ruling on it.

Comments
If you want specific instances of this stuff, I can tell you which challenges I know of that were judged unfairly, including the most recent, but I didn't feel the need to name name's here, this is just about passing a new part of the system so that we can try and keep this from happening in the future.