Camp Half-Blood Role Playing Wiki:Requesting User Rights

This is the page where users can request user rights. If you feel you deserve user rights, and it will benefit the wiki, then you may place a request below. Please read the instructions carefully before requesting user rights.

Rollback Rights

 * You should be a trusted member of the community.
 * You should have a strong history on this wiki. We don't accept people who have only edited a few times.
 * You must be a level five user.
 * You should have no history of vandalism, sock-puppetry, or rudeness.
 * Your Duties will be to assist in one of the three departments, Administration & Support, Activities & Development or Users & Regulation. As you are not in a specific department, you may help in any department, at any time, or pick one department and work mainly in that one.

Administrator Rights

 * You must have rollback rights.
 * You should be a trusted member of the community.
 * You should have no history of vandalism, sock-puppetry, or rudeness.
 * Upon running for Administrator, you must pick a department ahead of time, that has an opening,, Administration & Support, Activities & Development or Users & Regulation. Once you run, if you are succesful, depending on which department you are in, you will perform the duties necessary in that department, and assist the Bcrat leading that department. In a case of a bcrat going on vacation, you may be asked to cover running that department while they are gone.

Bureaucrat Rights

 * You must have administrator rights.
 * You should be a trusted member of the community.
 * You should have no history of vandalism, sock-puppetry, or rudeness.
 * The only way a bcrat spot will ever open up, is if one of the current 3 bcrats leaves, steps down or is demoted.

Nomination

 * 1) Choose to edit a section under "Requests" (either rollback, administrator, or bureaucrat).
 * 2) Add your name as a subheading like this: ===Your User Name===.
 * 3) Give a small statement of why you think you deserve the rights.

Voting
Users will then state whether the user deserves the rights or not. They will either agree, or disagree with the request. Only Rollbacks and up may vote on user rights.

Requests
Requests may be turned down simply because users with the rights are not needed. If your request is turned down, you can try again later when you have a stronger history, or when someone with the rights is needed.

Nar
As a few people here know I've officially been back for about 3 months now, and with it being the holidays and school being out of commision for a while I'd like to try for rollback (again). This doesn't mean I'm gonna step down when school starts. It's a simple matter of beginning simple and then adding more to the fire (I make it a point to try and take on as much as I can. Know your limits and all that crap >.<) Yea so anyway if you don't think I'm ready or w/e I would appriciate it if you told me why, so I can try and improve myself. Thanks in advance  17:56, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

For (+4)

 * 1) I know I haven't been exaclty active for a couple of weeks, but from what I've seen of you in the past, I say yes. I sort-of agree with Bach though. However, I know you have it in you to improve and be a role model. It's about finding that perfect balance of goofiness and seriousness. I'm a total goofball, but I believe I usually behave in a respectable way. I have faith in you!
 * 2) Well, I can say youre awesome and thanks for helping me even before when I was new :)

Against (-5)

 * 1) ok see on one hand I want to vote yes because you've been here for along time, you're a good rp'er, you are helpful when you want to be but there's this problem you see, like when you tell newbs in chat not to listen to you cuz you're a bad influence >.< I'm not clear on how serious you are, and if you want RB rights, users need to be able to look up to you so for now I vote no
 * 14:55, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[File:Owl.gif]]  LittleWiseOwlz -     Iris Message Me!       16:32, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Sorry but I agree with Bach >.< Miggy 13:11, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
On the fence with you Nar, both sides make equally good points. I will vote, I just need some thinking space and time.

What he said

Mika
Well, Minx is now Beauro so I would want to nominate Mika to adminship and here are my points with vague reasons:
 * 1) Friendly and its virtue packages- You have to admit, Mika has been has been pumping up chat and being very affable. I'm sure the newbies would l, no, LOVE him as well! Mika has encouraged me too much to be ignored and you can see my talk page as proofs. He always is grateful.
 * 2) Takes Iniative/Hospitable- He always asks if he can help out. He has a blog or "stall" for coding and photoshop to help others.
 * 3) Hardworking- Mika checks claims, not only unclaimed ones, but even double checks claimed claims. I know because he found 2-3 of my errors.. ^^"
 * 4) Wiki Friendly- Mika always remains happy and cheerful through dark circumstances and has stayed in the wiki and loved it very much. He determined and I know he has the best in mind for the wiki. He has quite a strong history in the wiki.He is also quite active.
 * 5) Has the Ability- You know this is true.
 * 6) Has Benificial Creativity
 * 7) Roleplaying Style- He asks people to roleplay with him to keep the wiki active, even one comment does count, which encourages people to roleplay. He gives fairness and extends his hand to all.  :D
 * 8) Deserving- I think he is, don't you? >.<

For (+8)

 * 1) Broken
 * 2) Well, I know Mika can sometimes be lazy and super loud on chat but he is helpful, asking people if he can code their pages (though sometimes he forgets to), rechecks claimed claims and a friend to everyone. Miggy 13:13, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) "Don't stop believin' Hold on to that feelin'."
 * 4) If he puts his mind to it, I think Mika could be a really good admin. [[File:Owl.gif]]  LittleWiseOwlz -     Iris Message Me!       08:32, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Rid's sig pic.png "I'm gonna     WRECK IT!"       <font color=#00A841>   15:50, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) <span style="padding-left:6px; background-color:#EB6A00; border:3px outset #EB0000;">Rid's sig pic.png <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>"I'm gonna     <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>WRECK IT!"       <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>   15:50, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) <span style="padding-left:6px; background-color:#EB6A00; border:3px outset #EB0000;">Rid's sig pic.png <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>"I'm gonna     <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>WRECK IT!"       <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=#00A841>   15:50, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Against (-4)

 * 1) I have to agree with Bach, and will thus vote against.... given some time, he may be a candidate in the future.
 * 2) (see reasons below, but seriously I mean 3 days before this nom went up he had made yet another inactive blog, he's had too many of those moments of inactivity and indecision to vote yes right now)
 * 3) Most of the reasons listed are good for rbs he doesn't check them all that much and the rest are kinda irrelevant.
 * 4) I'm going to have to agree with bach, considering you were just talked out of going inactive I think you should wait a while. Maybe in a couple weeks<span style="padding-left:6px; background-color:#990099; border:3px outset #00FF00;">[[File:Joker_by_NerdXV.gif]] <font face="Comic Sans MS"> Have you ever danced with     <font face="Comic Sans MS"> the devil in the pale moonlight?     <font face="Comic Sans MS"> -The Joker    <font face="Comic Sans MS">    05:51, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
I can't vote until I've seen him actually take on a major project and had follow through, which he's never done but currently has a major activity that he's started. Also Roleplaying style has nothing to do with being an admin or RB for that matter, same with wiki friendly. And you can't disregard his bouts of immaturity and leaving/inactive blogs he makes every few weeks, sure he's a great RB, but I need to see how well his follow through is for this next project before I can vote with good conscious. Don't get me wrong, I think he has potential, I just need to see proof of that potential before I can vote, and to be perfectly blunt, most of Broken's reasons for nom'ing him would maybe work for an RB, but not for an Admin

^ and I don't think rbs can nom for admin, anyway >.<

I'll admit, I'm on the fence on this one. On one hand, Bach has a point, but on the other hand I think he deserves the chance to prove himself... So I'm not going to vote on this one. Wolf (talk) 10:35, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Archives

 * Rollback Archives
 * Admin Archives
 * Bcrat Archives