The following voting has ended. If you disagree or want to re-open for another vote, please contact an administrator to do so. Please do not modify it.
So in going through past votes, I noticed a few that though they passed, we haven't actually addressed the changes. These votes are ones that passed but the wiki hasn't actually done anything to acknowledge the change:
Well this is an interesting issue... practicality suggests simply implementing them, but then given how long it's been since they were passed we might want to do a re-vote. At the moment I'm thinking a compromise might work best with us voting for or against each conclusion that was reached. For example, in the case of the BC vote we'd vote for or against the vote, not for each of its individual options. This way the original decision and the legitimacy of voting remain mostly intact, but we still get a decision on the matter. Of course if one of these is voted down, a new vote could always be create to address the matter anew.
For me, I feel we should implement the changes. The votes are finished and the numbers were not close to each other; therefore, I don't see if many wants to change something. However, I find Flame's proposal good as well :)There is a crime, but no criminal.★❣Broken❣★
Yea I considered just implementing without question, like in the case of the infirmary one I doubt that's changed or is a big deal, but a lot of the oracles and BC lts have changed since we voted, in fact all 3 BC lts have, so which means I'm not sure if those users voted or are comfortable with the idea that if they leave they give up rights to the char, or that no matter what they can't just send their char away or kill them off without serious complications....
I've said this once on chat, that when and if I leave, I wanted all my characters archived because I didn't want anyone roleplaying them. However, I am willing to give someone my lieutenant if I do leave. So I have to agree with Broken.
I'd ditto with the lot, since that's what I'm meaning to say too. Also, since I have an oracle (apprentice though) and a BC lt, I strongly agree to implement these votes. I also have the same idea with Brocky if ever I give someone my BC lt. Ever since I made the character, I made a pact with a user to carry on the deed. I find Flame's option/s at best too.
Honestly I don't see why these characters should operate any differently from Heinrich; he was originally my character and I surrendered him to the administration team once the Broken Covenant was released. Since these new Lieutenants will presumably be just as 'artificial' as him and the existing ones, I think we should break as many ties with the creators as possible to prevent complications in the future. If something absolutely must be given, let it be a veto instead of a selection.
Well they aren't shared characters like Heinrich though, but the constant switching of lts under Heinrich and oracles every time a user left or was too inactive to perform the duties was starting to make zero sense.
OH meant to add, this is more like how, you are the only one that rp's Anton, he is right now, your character in everyway, what you do with him, etc, but if you left, as decided awhile ago, Anton will remain head of Veritum and simply pass on to another user worthy, willing and qualified to take up heading veritum
I think we can all agree on that one, Brocky. Flamefang (talk) 05:05, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
For oracles this makes a lot of sense and is a very good idea. Making it so that they just kinda get passed on instead of the constant making of new ones is much easier. BC lt's also make sense- its just kinda weird to think about since they were originally made as personal characters- But I mean Flame was in the same postion with Henrich when he made him. SO yeah this policy makes sense. I like the idea of them kinda being "passed on" if that's a good way to describe it.Bctcz (talk) 01:46, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
"Passed on" is an excellent way to describe it. Since we haven't had any discussion here for about 6 days, and we seem to generally be in agreeance, perhaps we should wrap things up? Flamefang (talk) 06:43, October 30, 2013 (UTC)